Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3478 (AP)

B. KARTHIK KUMAR v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/15863/2026 · 2026-06-23

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders Date of pronouncement Date of uploading APHC010265452026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 15863/2026 Between: 1. B. KARTHIK KUMAR, S/O. B.VIJAY KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC ANALYST, 2. B.VIJAY KUMAR,, S/O. NOT KNOWN, MAJOR, OCC BUSINESS, ALL THE ABOVE ARE RESIDENTS OF FLAT NO. 103, SAI THIRUMALA RESIDENCY, STREET NO.2, LANE NO.9, TARNAKA HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE, PIN 500017. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS P SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, PIN 522238. 2. SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, KURNOOOL DISTRICT AT KURNOOL, PIN 518001. 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, PIN 518002. Neutral Citation: _____________ Date of reserved for orders : - : 24.06.2026 : 30.06.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 15863/2026 B. KARTHIK KUMAR, S/O. B.VIJAY KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC ANALYST, S/O. NOT KNOWN, MAJOR, OCC BUSINESS, ALL THE ABOVE ARE RESIDENTS OF FLAT NO. 103, SAI THIRUMALA RESIDENCY, STREET NO.2, LANE NO.9, TARNAKA HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE, PIN 500017. ...PETITIONER(S) AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS P SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, KURNOOOL DISTRICT AT KURNOOL, PIN 518001. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL , PIN 518002. Neutral Citation: _____________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3504] TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM B. KARTHIK KUMAR, S/O. B.VIJAY KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 36 S/O. NOT KNOWN, MAJOR, OCC BUSINESS, ALL THE ABOVE ARE RESIDENTS OF FLAT NO. 103, SAI THIRUMALA RESIDENCY, STREET NO.2, LANE NO.9, TARNAKA HYDERABAD, ...PETITIONER(S) THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, KURNOOOL DISTRICT AT DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL 2 MRK,J W.P.No.15863 of 2026 4. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KURNOOL III TOWN POLICE STATION, KURNOOL DISTRICT, PIN 518002. 5. SMT R NAVYA BHARATHI, W/O. B.KARTHIK KUMAR, D/O. RAGI RAVINDRA PRASAD, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O. H.NO. 40/1-B-K-S-T- 301, B.K. SINGH TOWERS, SAPTHAGIRI NAGAR, NEAR AYYAPPA SWAMY TEMPLE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, PIN 518002. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents, particularly the 4th respondent at the instance of 5th respondents in calling the petitioner to police station and insisting the petitioner to sit in police station from morning to evening and insisting the petitioner to yield the terms of 5th respondent in spite of issuance of statutory Notice under Section 35(3) BNSS, 2023 and the matter is pending in criminal petition in Crip No. 2278 of 2026 same is pending before this Hon'ble Court and without there being any authority or sanction of law and declare the same as illegal, arbitrary and unjust, and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent not to interfere in any manner with petitioner personal life and liberty and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents, particularly 4th respondent not to insist the petitioners to appear before his authority nor interfere in in any manner with petitioner personal life and liberty, in the interest of Justice, in pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. CHEVURI RAMA SWAMY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 MRK,J W.P.No.15863 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Dated: 24.06.2026 CM-MDP Whether the Order is: Speaking Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable