Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3477 (UTT)

VINOD KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/208/2026 · 2026-04-16

Shri Manoj Kumar Gupta, Subhash Upadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:2701-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. SUBHASH UPADHYAY Writ Petition (S/B) No.208 of 2026 16th April, 2026 Vinod Kumar -----Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others ----Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Pradeep Kumar Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Bhupesh Kandpal, learned counsel for respondent no.2. Mr. Yogesh Kumar Pacholia, learned counsel or respondent no.3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT : (per Mr. Manoj Kumar Gupta C. J.) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has retired on 31.01.2024 from the post of Deputy Librarian in G.B. Pant Institute of Engineering and Technology (respondent no.2 herein). He is claiming revised pay-scale w.e.f. 01.01.2006 under Career Advancement Scheme of AICTE as applicable to teaching staff w.e.f. 01.01.2009 (after completion of three years of service). 3. The representations filed by the petitioner in this behalf before the respondent – institute from time to time are stated to be pending. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent-institute be directed to take decision on the pending representations. 1 2026:UHC:2701-DB 5. Learned counsel for the respondent-institute has no objection to the same. 6. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation along with copy of the instant order within two weeks from today and the same shall be decided by the competent authority / respondent-institute within a further period of eight weeks strictly in accordance with law. 7. The claim for leave encashment, if any, made in the representation shall also be considered and decided. 8. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C. J.) (SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 16.04.2026 SS 2 SUKHBANT SINGH Digitally signed by SUKHBANT SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=71978f9c61bfde0ba69967c787b1764ea7bc7dd129a8a6 380d49b1885e628615, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=2D8B71B8D8E345F6B7F95B1DD4FB4BEBD2B7D72 C42261361AED33172F152148D, cn=SUKHBANT SINGH Date: 2026.04.18 11:00:44 +05'30'