Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34764 (KAR)

T.NAGARAJUNA REDDY v. K.S. JAYALAKSHMAMMA

RSA/1016/2020 · 2026-08-07

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010167892020 NC: 2026:KHC:42353 RSA No. 1016 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1016 OF 2020 (SP) BETWEEN: T.NAGARAJUNA REDDY S/O SRINIVASA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT THIMMASANDRA VILLAGE, AMBADJIDURGA HOBLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK - 563 125 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. G. BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. K.S. JAYALAKSHMAMMA W/O T.N. MANJUNATHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT THIMMASANDRA, AMBAJIDURGA HOBLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK - 563 125. 2. K NAGARAJ S/O GIDDANNANAVAR KEMPANNA, MAJOR, 3. K. SRINIVASA S/O GIDDANNAVARA KEMPANNA, MAJOR Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010167892020 NC: 2026:KHC:42353 RSA No. 1016 of 2020 4. SHOBHARANI W/O K. SRINIVASA, MAJOR, RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 4 ARE RESIDING AT THIMMASANDRA VILLAGE, AMBAJIDURGA HOBLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK - 563 125. 5. LALITHAMMA W/O.VENKATAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT PASARADINNE, (JATHAVARA POST) CHIKKABALALPUR TALUK - 562 101. 6. SMT. AARATHI W/O SHIVAMURTHY, MAJOR, R/AT KADARIPALYA, SIDLAGHATTA TOWN - 562 105. 7. SMT. SRIDEVI W/O GANGADHAR, MAJOR, R/AT MALLUR VILLAGE AND POST, SIDLAGHATTA TALUK - 562 105. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. C.S. PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2; R1 AND R3 ARE SERVED; R4 TO R7 ARE UNSERVED) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.12.2019 PASSED IN RA.No.24/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINTAMANI, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.01.2005 - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010167892020 NC: 2026:KHC:42353 RSA No. 1016 of 2020 PASSED IN OS.No.386/91 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN), AND JMFC, CHINTAMANI. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo for withdrawal. The memo reads as under: "The counsel for the appellant submits that since the parties to the above appeal have amicably settled the dispute out of Court, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to dismiss the above appeal as withdrawn in the interest of justice and equity.” Placing the memo on record, appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8