1 CGHC010272282021 2026:CGHC:39023 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 785 of 2021 Sanjay Singh S/o Shri Matabux Singh, Aged About 47 Years Occupation Bus Operator, R/o Rama World Tifra Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner versus 1 - Prem Prakash Sharma The Than Regional Transport Officer Bilaspur District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Now Presently Posted At Municipal Council Kondagaon District Kondagaon (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Gopi Chand Meshram, Joint Secretary Regional Transport Authority Raipur (Chhattisgarh), 3 - Rakesh Kumar Goutam S/o Siddnath Goutam, Power Of Attorney Holder Of Shahnawaj Khan Bus Operator Tifra New Bus Stand Bilaspur District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), 4 - Sandip Kumar Gupta Incharge Officer Flying Squad R.T.O. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondents GOURI MUDALIAR Digitally signed by GOURI MUDALIAR Date: 2026.09.07 11:35:51 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Shri Shailendra Kumar Bajpai, Advocate. For respondent No.2 : Shri Udit Khatri, Advocate. For respondent No.4 : Shri Gajendra Prakash Sahu, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Abhishek Thakur, Advocate. SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 02/09/2026 1. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that after passing of the interim order, no further order has been passed with regard to the permit subject matter of the writ petition nor any action has been taken against the petitioner herein. 2. Learned counsel for respondent No.4 also submits that no action has been taken against the petitioner with regard to his plying the vehicle based on the permit pursuant to the interim order. 3. When this Court posed question to learned counsel for the petitioner in view of the submission made by learned counsel for the respective parties as to whether the respondents herein/contemnors have interfered with the plying of the vehicle after passing of the order and filing of this contempt petition, he submits that no such information has been given to him by the petitioner. 3 4. In the aforementioned facts of the case, I do not find appropriate to continue with this contempt petition any further as the respondents have not violated the interim order passed by this Court after filing of this contempt petition since last about five years. 5. Accordingly, the contempt petition is closed and notice is discharged. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge gouri