Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34754 (CHH)

IQBAL AHMED v. RAJESH SUKUMAR TOPPO

CONT/1828/2025 · 2026-09-02

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010501882025 2026:CGHC:38963 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1828 of 2025 1 - Iqbal Ahmed S/o Lt Mary Khan Aged About 71 Years R/o Rahim Mnzil, Behind Punjab Tyres, Moudhapara, Raipur, P O And P S And Distt Raipur, C.G. 2 - Basheer Ahmed S/o Hidyayattullayh Aged About 66 Years R/o Near Amrit Shishu Mandir Santosh Nagar, Raipur, P S And Distt Raipur, C.G. 3 - Manjit Singh S/o Prabhat Singh Aged About 70 Years R/o Qtr. No. 187, New Rajendra Nagar, Janata Colony, Ravigram P O And Distt Raipur, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Rajesh Sukumar Toppo Managing Director, Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Limited.Shastri Chowk, Raipur, Tehsil And Distt Raipur, C.G. 2 - Shri S. Prakash (I.A.S.) Secretary, Department Of Water Resources, Department Of Transport, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, C.G. SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2026.09.03 15:25:52 +0530 2 3 - Shri Mukesh Bansal (I.A.S.) Secretary, Department Of Finance, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, C.G. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Sourabh, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Shri Malay Shrivastava, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 03.09.2026 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court, which is the subject matter of the present contempt proceeding, has already been complied with by the respondent-authorities. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent also submits that the directions issued by this Court have been duly complied with and nothing further remains to be done on the part of the respondents in terms of the order passed by this Court. 2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the order passed by this Court has already been complied with, no further cause survives for proceeding with the present contempt petition. 3 3. Accordingly, the present contempt petition stands disposed of. The rule issued against the respondents stands discharged. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE shoaib