OD-3 ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE WPO/337/2026 LLYOD LOGIC SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR VS UNION BANK OF INDIA AND ANR BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO Date : 06th August, 2026. Appearance: Mr. Arijit Bandhan, Adv. Mr. Biswaroop Mukherjee, Adv. Ms. Saheli Bose, Adv. …for the petitioner. Mr. Ranajit Chowdhury, Adv. Mr. Sudipto Chowdhury, Adv. Ms. Samporna Saha, Adv. …for the respondent nos.1-2. Mr. Anirban Pramanick, Adv. Mr. Punarbasu Nath, Adv. Ms. Bhagyasree Dey, Adv. … for SBI. Mr. Deep Basu Mallick, Adv. Ms. Antara Biswas, Adv. Ms. Mou Saha, Adv. … for intervenor. 1. Learned Counsel for the respondent bank submits that the bank has already de-freezed the account of the petitioner. The petitioner has admitted the submission of the respondent bank. Mr. Deep Basu Mallick, learned Advocate appearing for the Jagdish Kamal Gulati submits that his client namely Jagdish Kamal Gulati is the interested party and as such he may be allowed to intervene in the matter. 2 2. This Court finds that the grievance of the petitioner in the present writ application for a direction upon the respondent for de-freezing the account of the petitioner. Now the bank has already de-freezed the account of the petitioner. 3. Accordingly, this Court finds that nothing remains in the present writ application. WPO/337/2026 is disposed of as infructuous. 4. Thus the question of allowing the intervenor in the present writ application does not arise. (KRISHNA RAO, J.) mg