Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34742 (KAR)

SMT. CHANDRAMMA v. SMT. INDIRA

WP/576/2023 · 2026-08-11

Vijaykumar A Patil

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010012532023 NC: 2026:KHC:42558 WP No. 576 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO. 576 OF 2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. CHANDRAMMA W/O K VENAKATESH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO.1, KATHA NO 44/2/1 DEVASANDRA VILLAGE KRISHNARAJAPURAM VILLAGE BANGALORE EAST TALUK PRESENTLY KNOWN AS NO.1 DIESEL SHED ROAD JUSTICE BHIMAIAH LAYOUT SANJAYNAGAR KRISHNARAJAPURAM BANGALORE - 36 …PETITIONER (BY SMT. CHANDRAMMA, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. SMT. INDIRA D/O SRI K RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS 2. SMT B GEETHA W/O SHIVASWAMY AGED 30 YEARS Digitally signed by ANNAPURNA G Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010012532023 NC: 2026:KHC:42558 WP No. 576 of 2023 BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.P.61/B 3RD CROSS, NAGAPPA BLOCK SREERAMAPURAM BANGALORE - 21 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. KASHINATH J.D., ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 12.03.2020 PASSED BY THE LEARNED X ADDL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND ADDL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE , BENGALURU (SCCH- 16) IN EX.CASE.NO.1593/2019 (THE IMPUGNED ORDER PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER Sri Mahesh Kumar H, learned counsel for the petitioner, has filed a memo of retirement along with the acknowledgment of the petitioner for having returned the writ papers. The memo of retirement was filed on 05.06.2023. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010012532023 NC: 2026:KHC:42558 WP No. 576 of 2023 2. Having received the papers way back in 2023, the petitioner has not made any alternate arrangement for engaging counsel. In view of the same, Sri Mahesh Kumar H, learned counsel for the petitioner, is permitted to retire from the case. 3. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE SHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6