SH DIVAKAR KUMAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/23032/2026 · 2026-07-27
Nidhi Gupta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34738 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34738 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 117
Divakar Kumar and others
State of Haryana and others
CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
1. India has been filed by the petitioners for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus petitioners on the post on which they are wo appointment with all consequential benefits in view of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in SCC OnLine SC 3826’
2. petitioners has placed reliance upon a judgment dated 12.05.2026 passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in a bunch of writ petitions having leading case CWP State of Haryana and others 2026 titled as ‘ others’ to submit that the grievance of all the 50 petitioners herein is CWP-23032-2026 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.23032 of 2026 (O & M)
Date of decision : Divakar Kumar and others Versus Haryana and others
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Mr. Sunil K. Nehra, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Arun Dosanj, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Harish Kumar Nain, DAG, Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioners for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioners on the post on which they are wo appointment with all consequential benefits in view of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in ‘Jaggo vs. SCC OnLine SC 3826’. At the very outset, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon a judgment dated 12.05.2026 passed ordinate Bench of this Court in a bunch of writ petitions having leading case CWP-1770-2026, titled as ‘Deepak Singh and others State of Haryana and others’ including petit 2026 titled as ‘Dr. Ravi Godara and others ’ to submit that the grievance of all the 50 petitioners herein is
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 23032 of 2026 (O & M) Date of decision :-27.07.2026 …..Petitioners …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Sunil K. Nehra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Harish Kumar Nain, DAG, Haryana. Present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioners for issuance of a writ in the nature of directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioners on the post on which they are working from the date of their appointment with all consequential benefits in view of the judgment passed vs. Union of India and others, At the very outset, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon a judgment dated 12.05.2026 passed ordinate Bench of this Court in a bunch of writ petitions having Deepak Singh and others vs. ’ including petition bearing No. CWP-7007- Dr.
Ravi Godara and others vs. State of Haryana and ’ to submit that the grievance of all the 50 petitioners herein is VIJAY ASIJA 2026.07.30 12.30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
identical to that of the petitioners (in CWP to the same Depar regard, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners refers to the length of service of all the petitioners herein as enumerated in tabulated form in para No. 2 of the writ petition (at page No. 19 and as per which all the petitioners have rendered 10 years plus service. It is, therefore, prayed that the present petition may be disposed of in terms of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in as judgment case (supra)
3. ‘no objection’ to the same. 4. 5. parties, present Civil the State of Haryana/concerned Department to accord fresh consideration to the claim of each of the petitioners for regularization; and pass a speaking order thereupon within a period of keeping in mind the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in (supra) as well as judgment of this Court dated 12.05.2026 in Singh’s case (supra)
6. July 27, 202 Vijay Asija
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
CWP-23032-2026 (O & M) identical to that of the petitioners (in CWP-7007 to the same Department, rendering more than 10 years of service. In this regard, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners refers to the length of service of all the petitioners herein as enumerated in tabulated form in para No. 2 of the writ petition (at page No. 19 and as per which all the petitioners have rendered 10 years plus service. It is, therefore, prayed that the present petition may be disposed of in terms of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in as judgment of this Court dated 12.05.2026 passed in case (supra).
Learned counsel for the respondent ‘no objection’ to the same. Heard. Accordingly, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, present Civil Writ Petition stands disposed of, the State of Haryana/concerned Department to accord fresh consideration to the claim of each of the petitioners for regularization; and pass a speaking order thereupon within a period of 08 months keeping in mind the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in as well as judgment of this Court dated 12.05.2026 in Singh’s case (supra). Pending application(s) if any also stand(s) disposed of. , 2026
Vijay Asija
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
2 7007-2026) as they belonged tment, rendering more than 10 years of service. In this regard, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners refers to the length of service of all the petitioners herein as enumerated in tabulated form in para No. 2 of the writ petition (at page No. 19 and 20 of the paper-book), as per which all the petitioners have rendered 10 years plus service. It is, therefore, prayed that the present petition may be disposed of in terms of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jaggo’s case (supra) as well of this Court dated 12.05.2026 passed in Deepak Singh’s
Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that he Accordingly, with the consent of learned counsel for the
disposed of, with a direction to the State of Haryana/concerned Department to accord fresh consideration to the claim of each of the petitioners for regularization; and pass a 08 months from today, while keeping in mind the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jaggo’s case as well as judgment of this Court dated 12.05.2026 in Deepak Pending application(s) if any also stand(s) disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.07.30 12.30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document