Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34732 (PNJ)

ASHOK KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CWP/22965/2026 · 2026-07-27

Pankaj Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-22965-2026 140 CWP-22965-2026 Ashok Kumar ...... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & anr. ..... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN *** Present :- Ms. Anupam, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, whereby the petitioner prays for issuance of directions to respondent No.2 to proceed with the case/application dated 15.12.2025 stated to have been submitted through Diary No.3673562 dated 13.02.2026 (Annexure P-3). 2 The petitioner claims to have filed the said application for allotment under the Utilization of Surplus Area Scheme after the allotment made in favour of Mohinder Kumar was cancelled vide order dated 12.12.2024 passed by this Court in CWP No.954 of 1999, titled as Mohinder Kumar Vs. State of Punjab. 3 In the considered opinion of this Court, the present writ petition is merely pre-emptive in nature. The petitioner filed application before the POOJA SHARMA 2026.07.29 15:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-22965-2026 authorities on 13.02.2026. The petitioner has approached this Court by way of the present writ petition only as a pre-emptive measure without waiting for result/order of application. 4 Finding no merit in the present writ petition, the same is accordingly dismissed. ( PANKAJ JAIN ) 27.07.2026 JUDGE Pooja Sharma-I Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No POOJA SHARMA 2026.07.29 15:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document