ARJUN @ ARJUNRAM S/O SHRI NATHULAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/5117/2026 · 2026-04-07
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3472 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3472 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:14325] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5117/2026 Arjun @ Arjunram S/o Shri Nathulal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Medasar Baas Deedwana, Police Station Deedwana, District Deedwana-Kuchaman (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 07/04/2026
1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.218/2025 registered at Police Station Kis- hangarh, District Ajmer for offence under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 61(2) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that allegation against the present petitioner is related to sale of one Mahendra Balero Pick-up. It is argued that from perusal of the FIR, the matter appears to be of civil in nature. It is contended by
learned counsel for the petitioner that co-accused Chandan has al- ready been granted enlarged by this Court on 12.03.2026. The case is exclusively triable by Magistrate. He again submits that the
[2026:RJ-JP:14325] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5117/2026] petitioner is behind the bars since 29.01.2026. Though there is one case pending against the petitioner but he is on bail in that case. The trial of the case may take considerable time and no fur- ther custodial interrogation is required, hence on the ground of parity, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material avail- able on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Arjun @ Arjunram S/o Shri Nathulal, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J bmg/83