CWP-22243-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 113 CWP-22243-2026 Date of Decision: 27.07.2026 Anuradha Bali and others ..... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Akshay Jindal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Saurav Bhatia, Advocate and Ms. Kalyani Tehri, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Jastej Singh, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Mr. Somesh Arora, Advocate for respondent No.4. Mr. Vishal Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.5. Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, Advocate for respondent No.6. ***** DEEPAK SIBAL , J (ORAL) 1. With regard to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioners for quashing the election of respondents No.5 and 6 as President and Vice- President of Municipal Council, Sujanpur, because complex disputed questions of fact have emerged during the course of hearing of this petition, learned senior counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail alternative remedies, which we permit. DINESH BANSAL 2026.07.29 14:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CWP-22243-2026 -2- 2. With regard to the prayer made before us for administering oath to the petitioners, who are admittedly the newly elected Councillors of Municipal Council, Sujanpur, learned State counsel states that within one week, the needful shall be done. 3. Disposed of. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 27.07.2026 JUDGE D.Bansal Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DINESH BANSAL 2026.07.29 14:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh