Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3471 (UTT)

SHAROOKH v. MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED

WPMS/980/2026 · 2026-04-21

Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.980 of 2026 Sharookh ……….Petitioner Versus Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Limited ...Respondent Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Ms. Shumayla Zafri, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to pursue an appropriate remedy available in his favour. 3. The prayer, so made, is granted. 4. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Needless to say, petitioner may invoke the legal remedy available to him under private law. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 21.04.2026 AK