127 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-23034-2026 Date of decision: 27.07.2026 Rupender Singh and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Aditya Vashishath, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Naveen Singh Panwar, DAG, Haryana. HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) 1. The present civil writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for regularisation of his/her services for the post of TGT and PGT Teacher in view of the regularisation policy of the State Government dated 16.06.2014/18.06.2014. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that the petitioners are working as Guest Teachers in different locations at Haryana continuously for 15 years. The work extracted from the petitioner is perennial in nature which is indispensable for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has limited his prayer to the extent that the present petition be treated as a comprehensive representation and the same be decided in a time bound manner by passing a speaking order after affording the petitioner an opportunity of being heard. NEHA 2026.07.29 15:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh CWP-23034-2026 -2- 4. Notice of motion. 5. Mr. Naveen Singh Panwar, DAG, Haryana puts in appearance and accepts on behalf of the respondents and submits that the grievance raised by the petitioners in the present writ petition would be considered by passing a speaking order in accordance with the law by respondent No.2. 6. Therefore, in view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of and respondent No.2 is directed to treat this writ petition as a comprehensive representation and consider the claim of the petitioner in light of judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.1996 of 2024 titled as Madan Singh and others Vs. State of Haryana and others decided on 16.04.2026 and the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP No.5686 of 2016 titled as Sukhvinder Singh and others Vs. State of Haryana and another decided on 25.05.2026 pass a speaking order after affording them an opportunity to be heard, within a period of 03 months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereof shall be conveyed to the petitioners. Needless to say, if the petitioners are found entitled to the relief sought, the same shall be granted forthwith by respondent No.2. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 27.07.2026 Neha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No NEHA 2026.07.29 15:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh