[2026:RJ-JP:14133] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4486/2026 Himmat Singh S/o Shri Prabhu Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 26, Sanjay Nagar, Niwaru Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur-302012, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary To The Government Department Of Education, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan 2. Managing Committee, Narayana E-Techno School, 131, Krishna Colony, Kumasia, Jhotwara Industrial Area, Jaipur Through Its Secretary. 3. Inspira Management Services Private Limiate, 10Th Floor, Melane Tower, 8084, Patrika Nagar, High-Tech City. Madhapur, Hydrabad-500081, Talangana Through Its Director. 4. Central Board Of Secondary Education, Through Its Regional Director, Todarmal Marg, Ajmer, Rajasthan. 5. Director Secondary Education, Rajasthan Bikaner. 6. Principal, Narayana E-Techno School, 131, Krishna Colony, Kumasia, Jhotwara Industrial Area, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D.P. Sharma. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sandeep Pathak. Mr. Arnav Singh. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNNURI LAXMAN Order 06/04/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order of termination dated 31.01.2026 (Annex.4) passed by the Managing Committee of the respondent No.6. [2026:RJ-JP:14133] (2 of 3) [CW-4486/2026] 2. The present writ petition was filed in the background that the Tribunal constituted under the provisions of the Rajasthan Non- Government Educational Institutions Act, 1989 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the Act of 1989’) was not functional when the order of termination was passed. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the Tribunal has now been constituted and is functional and therefore, the present writ petition is required to be disposed of with the direction to the petitioner to approach the concerned Tribunal constituted under the provisions of the Act of 1989. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has disputed the aforesaid situation. 5. In view of the effective remedy provided under Section 19 of the Act of 1989, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present writ proceedings. 6. This Court is of the view that the interim protection granted in favour of the petitioner is required to be extended till the petitioner approaches the competent Tribunal and till his application for interim order is considered. 7. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that all the issues raised herein in this writ petition should be left open to be agitated before the Tribunal concerned including the maintainability of the appeal before the Tribunal. 8. Considering the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned Tribunal within a period of two weeks from today and the Tribunal is directed to consider any application for interim relief if filed [2026:RJ-JP:14133] (3 of 3) [CW-4486/2026] along with the appeal by the petitioner. Till any such application is filed and is considered by the Tribunal concerned, the interim protection granted by this Court in favour of the petitioner shall be continued. 9. The Tribunal is directed to consider and decide the application for interim relief within a period of one month from the date of filing of the appeal; and in the event that the appeal along with any such application for interim relief is not filed by the petitioner within a period of two weeks, the interim protection granted by this Court stands vacated. 10. The pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (MUNNURI LAXMAN),J 57-Mohan/