Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34692 (CHH)

UMESH KUMAR DUBEY v. TEEKAM PRASAD DUBEY

MA/114/2026 · 2026-09-02

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010256002026 2026:CGHC:39080 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MA No. 114 of 2026 Umesh Kumar Dubey S/o- Late Gajanand Dubey Aged About 48 Years R/o- Village Ganiya Tehsil- Nawagarh, District- Bemetara (C.G.) ... Appellant versus 1 - Teekam Prasad Dubey S/o- Late Gajanand Dubey, Aged About 56 Years R/o- Naya Para, Bemetara, Tehsil And District- Bemetara (C.G.) 2 - Jainendra Kumar Dubey S/o- Late Gajanand Dubey Aged About 54 Years R/o- Nohar Gali, Ward No. 21, Bemetara, Tehsil And District- Bemetara (C.G.) 3 - Prahlad Kumar Dubey, S/o- Late Gajanand Dubey Aged About 50 Years R/o- Nohar Gali, Ward No. 21, Bemetara, Tehsil And District- Bemetara (C.G.) 4 - Smt. Girja Joshi Wd/o- Late Pramod Joshi Aged About 55 Years R/o- Jwahar Ward, Mungeli, Tehsil And District- Mungeli, (C.G.) 5 - Chitra @ Gulaba Choubey, Wd/o-Late Surendra Kumar Dubey Aged About 53 Years R/o- Nawagarh, Tehsil- Nawagarh, District- Bemetara (C.G.) 6 - Satyabhama Choubey W/o- Jayprakash Choubey Aged About 52 Years R/o- Nawagarh, Tehsil Nawagarh, District- Bemetara (C.G.) 7 - Manorama Dubey Wd/o- Late Gajanand Dubey Aged About 71 Years R/o- Nohar Gali, Ward No. 21, Bemetara, Tehsil And District- Bemetara (C.G.) 8 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Bemetara, District- Bemetara (C.G.) ... Respondents For Appellant : Mr. Arvind Kumar Dubey, Advocate For Respondent No.8/State : Mr. Mayur Khandelwal, Panel Lawyer (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 03.09.2026 BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP DN: cn=BINI PRADEEP, ou=HIGH COURT, o=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN 2 1. Heard. 2. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of the Court to withdraw present appeal with liberty to file appropriate petition. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection on the above prayer made on behalf of the appellant. 4. On due consideration, the prayer made on behalf of the appellant is allowed and the appellant is permitted to withdraw the instant appeal with liberty as prayed for. 5. Accordingly, present misc. appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. 6. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. 7. Registry is directed to return the certified copy of impugned orders after retaining photocopy of the same on record. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini