PAWAN KUMAR SHARMA S/O SHRI PRAVEEN SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/2623/2026 · 2026-03-16
Sangeeta Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3469 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3469 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:10943] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2623/2026 Pawan Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Praveen Sharma, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Plot No. 100, Vikas Nagar, Heerapura, Ajmer Road, Police Station Karni Vihar, District Jaipur (Presently Lodged At Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Jain For State For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP Mr. Sahajveer Baweja Mr. Kanak Sharma HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Order 16/03/2026
1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 762/2025 registered at Police Station Pratap Nagar, Jaipur City(East) for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of BNS.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel also contends that the petitioner is in custody since 28.01.2026 and recovery has already been effected. He further submits that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. He submits that petitioner is not required for further investigation. He submits that in the other cases registered against him, he is already on bail. He submits that there are commercial transactions between the
[2026:RJ-JP:10943] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2623/2026] parties for a long time and conclusion of trial will take time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody and therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposes the submissions made by
learned counsel for the petitioner hereinabove and submits that there are criminal antecedents against accused-petitioner Pawan Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Praveen Sharma.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is in custody since 28.01.2026; the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; the nature of dispute is commercial and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Pawan Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Praveen Sharma is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
[2026:RJ-JP:10943] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2623/2026]
6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not be involved in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station.
7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.
(SANGEETA SHARMA),J HEENA/83