Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34686 (CHH)

MOHD. SHARIF (DEAD) SHAYRA BANO v. RAJESH KUMAR YADAV

MAC/256/2024 · 2026-09-01

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010037402024 2026:CGHC:38940 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 256 of 2024 1 - Mohd. Sharif (Dead) Shayra Bano W/o Late Mohd. Sharif, Aged About 55 Years R/o Ward No. 20, Chainpur, P.S. Manendragarh, District Manendragarh Chirmiri Bharatpur Chhattisgarh. ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Rajesh Kumar Yadav S/o Mulai Ram Yadav, Aged About 36 Years R/o War No. 9, Kachhi Mohalla, Badsara, P.S. Badsara, District Katni (M.P.) (Driver) 2 - Lovely Automobile, Pro Mahendra Kumar Gupta, N.H.O.-7, Kuthla Mudwara Katni, District Katni (M.P) (Owner) 3 - Branch Manager, The Oriental Company Limited New Basti Katni, District Katni Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Appellants : None For Respondents No.1 & 2 Mr. Amit Bhardwaj, Advocate, on behalf of Mr. Ramsajiwan, Advocate For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Abhishek Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order On Board 02/09/2026 1. The present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act has been filed against the impugned award dated 08.12.2023 BHOLA NATH KHATAI Digitally signed by BHOLA NATH KHATAI Date: 2026.09.05 13:38:40 +0530 2 passed by the First Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Manendragarh, District Korea, CG, in Claim Case No.51/2022. 2. On the previous dates of hearings, i.e., 07.05.2026 & 25.06.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. 3. Today, when the matter was called for hearing, there was again no representation on behalf of the appellant. The present appeal has been preferred by the claimant against the dismissal of claim application by the Tribunal. 4. Hence, in the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellant, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 5. Accordingly, the present appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) JUDGE Khatai