Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34684 (PNJ)

KASHMIR KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB THROUGH THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT

CWP/23427/2026 · 2026-07-30

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 165 KASHMIR KAUR STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: Present: TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA 20.05.2026. The Registry raised objection in this petition, but the same was never taken back for re 2. the concerned Advocate was requested to collect his petition lying with objection. As per office report, message number of the Advocate, but nobody came forward. 3. 30.07.2026, still no one is present. 4. be passed. The file be consigned to the record. 30.07.2026 AD IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP- Date of decision: KASHMIR KAUR Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA None. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The aforesaid petition was filed by the concerned counsel on . The Registry raised objection in this petition, but the same was never taken back for re-filing after removal of objection. A note was published by the Registry in the cause list, the concerned Advocate was requested to collect his petition lying with objection. As per office report, message was also sent number of the Advocate, but nobody came forward. The instant case is shown in the cause list fo , still no one is present. In view of the aforesaid facts, no further orders are required to be passed. The file be consigned to the record. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -23427-2026 Date of decision: 30.07.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondents TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The aforesaid petition was filed by the concerned counsel on . The Registry raised objection in this petition, but the same was filing after removal of objection. A note was published by the Registry in the cause list, whereby the concerned Advocate was requested to collect his petition lying with was also sent on registered mobile number of the Advocate, but nobody came forward. The instant case is shown in the cause list for today, i.e., In view of the aforesaid facts, no further orders are required to be passed. The file be consigned to the record. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No ...Petitioner s The aforesaid petition was filed by the concerned counsel on . The Registry raised objection in this petition, but the same was whereby the concerned Advocate was requested to collect his petition lying with on registered mobile r today, i.e., In view of the aforesaid facts, no further orders are required to AMAN DUA 2026.07.30 14:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document