Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34681 (PAT)

Most. Rukminia v. Most. Piyariya Kuer

SA/165/1992 · 2026-02-03

Ramesh Chand Malviya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SECOND APPEAL No.165 of 1992 ====================================================== Most. Rukminia Widow of Late Ram Bachan Chamar, resident of Mohalla- Chawartakiya, P.S. Sasaram, District Rohtas. ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. Most. Piyariya Kuer Widow of Late Angrahit Ram, Resident of Mohalla- Chawartakiya, P.S. Sasaram, District Rohtas. 2. Prakash Ram, Son of Late Angrahit Chamar, Resident of Mohalla- Chawartakiya, P.S. Sasaram, District Rohtas. 3. Dadan Ram, Son of Late Angrahit Chamar, Resident of Mohalla- Chawartakiya, P.S. Sasaram, District Rohtas. 4. Ashok Kumar, Son of Late Angrahit Chamar, Resident of Mohalla- Chawartakiya, P.S. Sasaram, District Rohtas. 5. Suresh Kumar, Son of Late Angrahit Chamar, Resident of Mohalla- Chawartakiya, P.S. Sasaram, District Rohtas. 6. Dulhin Kawalpatiya Wife of Basant Ram at Hathni, P.S. Baraon, District Rohtas. 7. Prabhawati Devi, Wife of Kameshwar Prasad Sinha, resident of village Khirhindi, P.S. Sheosagar, District Rohtas at present Mohalla Khilanganj, Sasaram, Rohtas. 8. Awadhesh Ram, Son of Sipahi Ram Village Karup, P.S. Karakat, Rohtas. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with SECOND APPEAL No. 166 of 1992 ====================================================== Awadhesh Ram,Son of Sipahi Ram at Karup, P.O. Itarhiya, P.S. Karakat, Rohtas. ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. Piariya kuer, Widow of late Angrahit Rai. 2. Prakash Ram 3. Dadan Ram 4. Ashok Kumar 5. Suresh Kumar All Son sons of Late Angarahit Rai, Resident of Mohalla-Chawartakiya, Sasaram, Rohtas. 6. Most. Rukiniya, Widow of late Ram Bachan Ram, Resident of Mohalla- Chawartakiya, Sasaram, Rohtas. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with SECOND APPEAL No. 167 of 1992 Patna High Court SA No.165 of 1992(8) dt.03-02-2026 2/3 ====================================================== Most. Rukminia Widow of Late Ram Bachan Chamar, resident of Mohalla- Chawartakiya, P.S. Sasaram, District Rohtas. ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. Most. Piyariya Kuer Widow of Late Angrahit Ram, Resident of Mohalla- Chawartakiya, P.S. Sasaram, District Rohtas. 2. Prakash Ram, Son of Late Angrahit Ram, Resident of Mohalla- Chawartakiya, P.S. Sasaram, District Rohtas. 3. Dadan Ram, Son of Late Angrahit Ram, Resident of Mohalla- Chawartakiya, P.S. Sasaram, District Rohtas. 4. Ashok Kumar, Son of Late Angrahit Ram, Resident of Mohalla- Chawartakiya, P.S. Sasaram, District Rohtas. 5. Suresh Kumar, Son of Late Angrahit Ram, Resident of Mohalla- Chawartakiya, P.S. Sasaram, District Rohtas. 6. Prabhawati Devi, Wife of Kameshwar Prasad, Resident of Village-Khirihiri, P.s. Sheosagar, District-Rohtas at present resident of Mohalla- Khilanganj, P.S. Sasaram, District-Rohtas. 7. Awadhesh Ram, Son of Sipahi Ram, Resident of Ward No. 6, P.S. Sasaram, District- Rohtas. 8. Dulhin Kawalpatiya @ Kalpatiya, Daughter of Late Sitaram and Wife of Basant Ram, Resident of village Hathni, P.S. Nokha, District Rohtas. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In SECOND APPEAL No. 165 of 1992) For the Appellant/s : None For the Respondent/s : None (In SECOND APPEAL No. 166 of 1992) For the Appellant/s : None For the Respondent/s : None (In SECOND APPEAL No. 167 of 1992) For the Appellant/s : None For the Respondent/s : None ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 8 03-02-2026 On several dates, i.e., on 04.09.2025, 11.09.2025, 09.10.2025, 13.10.2025, and 06.01.2026, nobody appears on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellants. 2. On perusal of the records, it appears that this Patna High Court SA No.165 of 1992(8) dt.03-02-2026 3/3 second appeal is of the year 1992 and the appellants are absented from several dates and even today, on repeated calls, nobody appears on behalf of the appellants, so in this circumstances, this second appeal is dismissed for default under Order XLI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Anand Kr. (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) U