HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6381 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard. 2. In view of the order, which is being proposed to be passed today, notices are not being issued to the respondents. 3. The solitary relief claimed in the present writ petition is for a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.)/ Judicial Magistrate, Dumariyaganj, Siddharthnagar to decide the Civil Judge (J.D.)/Judicial Magistrate, Dumariyaganj, Siddharthnagar to decide the application/ Misc. Case No. 18/2025 (Majahar Vs. Taubab Ali), under order-9, Rule-13 & section-151 C.P.C. in Original Case No. 299 of 2020 (Taubab Ali Vs. Majahar). 4. Learned counsel prayed that the said suit may be decided, expeditiously. 5. Since the above-mentioned case is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 6. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.)/ Judicial Magistrate, Dumariyaganj, Siddharthnagar to decide the Civil Judge (J.D.)/Judicial Magistrate, Dumariyaganj, Siddharthnagar to decide the application/ Misc. Case No. 18/2025 (Majahar Vs. Taubab Ali), under order-9, Rule-13 & section-151 C.P.C. in Original Case No. 299 of 2020 (Taubab Ali Vs. Majahar), expeditiously, without granting any unnecessary adjournments, subject to legal impediment. May 6, 2026 N.S.Rathour Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd Shamim Khan, Noor Jahan Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Majahar .....Petitioner(s) Taubab Ali .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad