REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM M/S DEEPAK WOOLEN v. THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR,EMPLOYEE ST.INS.CORP.
FAO/1933/1997 · 2026-07-28
Harkesh Manuja
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34670 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34670 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
207
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM M/S DEEPAK WOOLEN EXPORT DIVISION
THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present: None for the
Mr. P.S. Doon, Advocate for the respondents.
HARKESH MANUJA
A perusal of order dated 01.04.2026 shows that no one appeared on behalf of the
Even today, despite the case having been called twice, no one has appeared on behalf of the appellant. It seems that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the present appeal. As such, the present appeal is dismissed for want of Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
28.07.2026 Tejwinder
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:
REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM M/S DEEPAK WOOLEN EXPORT DIVISION
Versus THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR AND ORS.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA None for the appellant. Mr. P.S. Doon, Advocate for the respondents. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
A perusal of order dated 01.04.2026 shows that no one appeared on behalf of the appellant. Even today, despite the case having been called twice, no one has appeared on behalf of the appellant. It seems that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the present appeal. As such, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(HARKESH MANUJA)
Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable
HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-1933-1997 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 28, 2026
REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM M/S DEEPAK WOOLEN MILLS
........Appellant
........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Mr. P.S. Doon, Advocate for the respondents.
A perusal of order dated 01.04.2026 shows that no one Even today, despite the case having been called twice, no one has appeared on behalf of the appellant. It seems that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the present appeal. As such, the present
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No
(O&M) July 28, 2026
A perusal of order dated 01.04.2026 shows that no one Even today, despite the case having been called twice, no one has appeared on behalf of the appellant. It seems that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the present appeal. As such, the present TEJWINDER SINGH 2026.07.30 12:23 I agree to specified portions of this document