Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34670 (PNJ)

REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM M/S DEEPAK WOOLEN v. THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR,EMPLOYEE ST.INS.CORP.

FAO/1933/1997 · 2026-07-28

Harkesh Manuja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

207 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM M/S DEEPAK WOOLEN EXPORT DIVISION THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: None for the Mr. P.S. Doon, Advocate for the respondents. HARKESH MANUJA A perusal of order dated 01.04.2026 shows that no one appeared on behalf of the Even today, despite the case having been called twice, no one has appeared on behalf of the appellant. It seems that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the present appeal. As such, the present appeal is dismissed for want of Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 28.07.2026 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM M/S DEEPAK WOOLEN EXPORT DIVISION Versus THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR AND ORS. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA None for the appellant. Mr. P.S. Doon, Advocate for the respondents. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) A perusal of order dated 01.04.2026 shows that no one appeared on behalf of the appellant. Even today, despite the case having been called twice, no one has appeared on behalf of the appellant. It seems that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the present appeal. As such, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-1933-1997 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 28, 2026 REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM M/S DEEPAK WOOLEN MILLS ........Appellant ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Mr. P.S. Doon, Advocate for the respondents. A perusal of order dated 01.04.2026 shows that no one Even today, despite the case having been called twice, no one has appeared on behalf of the appellant. It seems that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the present appeal. As such, the present Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No (O&M) July 28, 2026 A perusal of order dated 01.04.2026 shows that no one Even today, despite the case having been called twice, no one has appeared on behalf of the appellant. It seems that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the present appeal. As such, the present TEJWINDER SINGH 2026.07.30 12:23 I agree to specified portions of this document