Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34668 (PNJ)

PREET MOHINDER SINGH GILL v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/23248/2026 · 2026-07-29

Kuldeep Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-23248 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (119) Preet Mohinder Singh Gill and others State of Punjab CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. impugned order dated were debarred from promotion and denied the opportunity of station allotment. 2. concerned, and have also filed a representation dated 12.01.2026 (Annexure P has been taken on the said representation by the authorities concerned. 3. 4. on advance notice of the petition, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State, and waives service. 23248-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Preet Mohinder Singh Gill and others Versus Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI None for the petitioners. Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, AAG, Punjab. *** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) Through the instant writ petition, order dated 14.01.2025 (Annexure P were debarred from promotion and denied the opportunity of station The petitioners have raised their gri concerned, and have also filed a representation dated 12.01.2026 (Annexure P-5), in this regard. However, has been taken on the said representation by the authorities concerned. Notice of motion. Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, AAG, Punjab, who is present in the Court, on advance notice of the petition, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State, and waives service. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-23248-2026 Date of Decision : 29.07.2026 ...Petitioners Versus ...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Sahil R. Bakshi, AAG, Punjab. instant writ petition, challenge is thrown to the 14.01.2025 (Annexure P-3), whereby, the petitioners were debarred from promotion and denied the opportunity of station The petitioners have raised their grievance with the authorities concerned, and have also filed a representation dated 12.01.2026 . However, till date, no decision, whatsoever, has been taken on the said representation by the authorities concerned. Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, AAG, Punjab, who is present in the Court, on advance notice of the petition, accepts notice on behalf of the challenge is thrown to the 3), whereby, the petitioners were debarred from promotion and denied the opportunity of station evance with the authorities concerned, and have also filed a representation dated 12.01.2026 no decision, whatsoever, Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, AAG, Punjab, who is present in the Court, on advance notice of the petition, accepts notice on behalf of the MANPREET SINGH 2026.07.30 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-23248 5. instant writ petition can be disposed of with a respondents, to in a time bound manner. 6. mandamus is passed upon the respondents. 7. a mandamus, dated 12.01.2026 to the petitioners certified copy of this order. July 29, 2026 Manpreet 23248-2026 At this stage, this Court is of the considered opinion that instant writ petition can be disposed of with a respondents, to decide the representation (supra), by passing a speaking order, in a time bound manner. Learned counsel for the State, raises no objection, in case, such is passed upon the respondents. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is mandamus, upon the respondents, to consider and decide the r dated 12.01.2026 (Annexure P-5), after affording due opportunity of hearing the petitioners, within a period of eight weeks, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2 At this stage, this Court is of the considered opinion that the instant writ petition can be disposed of with a mandamus, upon the decide the representation (supra), by passing a speaking order, Learned counsel for the State, raises no objection, in case, such In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of with upon the respondents, to consider and decide the representation , after affording due opportunity of hearing , within a period of eight weeks, from the date of receipt of (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No the , upon the decide the representation (supra), by passing a speaking order, Learned counsel for the State, raises no objection, in case, such with epresentation , after affording due opportunity of hearing , within a period of eight weeks, from the date of receipt of MANPREET SINGH 2026.07.30 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment