1 CGHC010324432023 2026:CGHC:38939 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1657 of 2023 1 - Rohit Kumar Mathur S/o Shri Nathuram Mathur Aged About 36 Years R/o A.T. 122, Ward No. 27, Indira Nagar, Doundi, Tehsil Dalli Rajhara, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh.............(Driver And Owner) ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Smt. Shanti Bai Sahu Wd/o Late Sunderlar Lal Sahu Aged About 61 Years R/o Village Ghupsal Post Bandhabazaar, P.S. Gendatola, Tehsil Churiya, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Hiralal Sahu S/o Late Sunderlar Lal Sahu Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Ghupsal Post Bandhabazaar, P.S. Gendatola, Tehsil Churiya, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Komal Singh Sahu S/o Late Sunderlar Lal Sahu Aged About 37 Years R/o Village Ghupsal Post Bandhabazaar, P.S. Gendatola, Tehsil Churiya, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh................(Claimants) 4 - The United India Insurance Company Limited Through Branch Office, In Front Of United Hospital, First Floor, Near Suman Medical, Old Bus Stand Road, Rajnandgaon, Tehsil And District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh..................(Insurance Company) ... Respondent(s) For Appellants : None For Respondent No.4 : Mr. B. N. Nande, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal BHOLA NATH KHATAI Digitally signed by BHOLA NATH KHATAI Date: 2026.09.05 13:38:13 +0530 2 Order On Board 02/09/2026 1. The present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act has been filed against the impugned award dated 26.08.2023 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rajnandgaon, CG in Claim Case No.186/2019. 2. On the previous date of hearing, i.e., 23.07.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. 3. Today, when the matter was called for hearing, there was again no representation on behalf of the appellant, which shows that the appellant is no longer interested in pursuing the appeal. 4. Hence, in the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellant, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 5. Accordingly, the present appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) JUDGE Khatai