Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34656 (CHH)

ROHIT KUMAR RATHORE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPPIL/16/2021 · 2026-09-02

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010026322021 2026:CGHC:38984-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPPIL No. 16 of 2021 Rohit Kumar Rathore Son Of Shri Kanhaiya Lal Rathore Aged About 57 Years Resident Of MIG-21, Laxmi Niwas, Lodhipara, Sarkanda, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Commissioner (Revenue) Bilaspur Division, District- Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Commissioner Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Joint Director Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh, Regional Office, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondents No.1 to 3/State : Mr.S.S.Baghel, Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2026.09.05 10:29:37 +0530 2 Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 03 .09 .2026 1. Case is called out. None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the instant WPPIL. However, Mr.S.S.Baghel, learned Government Advocate appearing for respondents No.1 to 3/State, is present. 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: “10.1 The Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no. authorities to immediately take action and remove the encroachment from the government ponds (as mentioned in para 8.2 of the petition). 10.2 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to demolish all the existing infrastructure on the government ponds mentioned in para 8.2 of the instant petition especially on Khasara no.734 and its part of Bilaspur. 10.3 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to take immediate steps for the beautification and maintenance of the ponds as mentioned in para 8.2 of the writ petition. 10.4 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to pass any further orders, as it may deem fit, in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. None appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner to press this WPPIL when the case is called out. 3 4. It transpires that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the matter. 5. Accordingly, the instant WPPIL is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu