Gadekula Venkata Ramana, v. Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Limited
WP/7037/2026 · 2026-06-24
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3464 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3464 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010133302026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY, THE 25th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NOS: 7037 OF 2026 Between:
1. GADEKULA VENKATA RAMANA,, S/O. G.SUBBARAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. 41-1226-1, SANKARAPURAM, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
2. M/S.S.N.CONSTRUCTIONS,, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR B.SAI VIJAYA KRISHNA, S/O. B.BALA SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. FLAT NO.301, ANURADHA NILAYAM MARUTHINAGAR POST, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT..
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR.
2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, AP TRANSCO KADAPA ZONE, KADAPA.
3. SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
4. SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, /400KV/OMC/KADAPA
YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
2
1. P SRAVAN KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
2. V V SATISH
3
The Court made the following ORAL ORDER:
Learned counsel for the writ petitioners submits that this writ petition is filed challenging some of the tender conditions mentioned in the tender notification, issued by the Respondents under which, the respondents are going to award work. He further submits that subsequently, the respondents are withdrawn the challenged tender notification and new tender notification was also issued and seeks permission of this Court to grant liberty to institute for fresh writ petition.
2. Learned Standing Counsel for Respondents submits that the existing tender conditions, which are under challenge in this writ petition is withdrawn and new tender notification was also issued. Considering the submissions of the both counsel, no further adjudication is required in this matter and the writ petition is liable to be closed.
3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed as infructuous. The writ petitioners are at liberty to file fresh writ petitions, if so advised.
4. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ______________________________________ JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
Date: 25.06.2026 MNR
Whether the order is :
Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No
Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
4
80
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO.7037 OF 2026
Dt: 25.06.2026 Mnr