1 CGHC010333762026 2026:CGHC:39031 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 834 of 2026 1 - Branch Manager The Oriental Inaurance Company Limited, Hotel Laxman Avenue, Medical Collage Road Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) (Insurer Of Truck No. C.G.-18/ H-1707). ... Applicant versus 1 - Smt. Urmila Nareti W/o Late Phool Singh Aged About 47 Years (Mother Of Deceased No. 1 And Wife Of Deceased No.2 ), Caste -Gond, Residence -Gram Randha, Thana Keshkaal Distt -Dantewada (C.G.) (Claimant). 2 - Narendra Lal Nareti S/o Late Phool Singh Aged About 29 Years (Brother Of Deceased No. 1 And Father Of Deceased No.2 ), Caste - Gond, Residence -Gram Randha, Thana Keshkaal Distt -Dantewada (C.G.) (Claimant). 3 - Munna Lal Nareti S/o Late Phool Singh Aged About 15 Years Brother Of Deceased No. 1 And Father Of Deceased No.2 ), Minor Through Claimant No. 3 Claim Friend / Mother Shri Urmila Nareti Caste -Gond, Residence -Gram Randha, Thana Keshkaal Distt - Dantewada (C.G.) (Claimant). 4 - Hera Lal Yadav S/o Yashcharan Yadav Aged About 32 Years R/o Kewti, Thana Garh District Reva Madhya Pradesh (Driver Of The Truck C.G. -18/ H -1707). 5 - Smt. Purnima Soni W/o Anil Soni R/o Main Road Ambedkar Ward Bacheli District Dantawada Chhattisgarh (Owner Of The Truck C.G. - 18/ H -1707). ... Respondent(s) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant : Mr. Deepak Gupta, Adv. For Respondents/Claimants : Mr. Shikhar Shukla, Adv. SOURABH PATEL Digitally signed by SOURABH PATEL Date: 2026.09.03 15:25:17 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 03.09.2026 1. Heard. 2. The present MCC has been preferred by the Petitioner seeking modification/correction of the order dated 03.08.2026 passed in MAC No. 947/2025. In the said order, the amount of compensation towards loss of dependency, i.e., Rs. 13,85,160/-, when added to the amount awarded under the other conventional heads, i.e., Rs. 1,65,000/-, comes to Rs. 15,50,160/-. However, due to an inadvertent calculation error, the total amount has been typed as Rs. 16,85,952/- instead of Rs. 15,50,160/- in paragraph Nos. 7 (computation table), 8 and 9 of the said order. The Petitioner, therefore, seeks appropriate modification/correction of the aforesaid order to the extent of correcting the total amount of compensation from Rs. 16,85,952/- to Rs. 15,50,160/-. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the claimants has no objection to the aforesaid correction. 4. Considering the submissions made by counsel for the Applicant, the instant MCC is allowed. 5. Accordingly, in the order dated 03.08.2026 passed in MAC No. 947/2025, the total amount of compensation awarded by this Court shall be read as “Rs. 15,50,160/-” in place of “Rs. 3 16,85,952/-” in paragraph Nos. 7 (computation table), 8 and 9. 6. With the aforesaid terms, the instant MCC stands disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge $ourabh