[2026:RJ-JP:14013] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6015/2026 Kaneej Fatma D/o Bali Mohammad W/o Shafikuddin, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Shahganj Agra District Agra. ----Petitioner/Plaintiff Versus 1. Shafi Mohammad S/o Bali Mohammad, R/o Mohalla Jamalpura Gumat Town Badi, Tehasil Badi. 2. Shami Mohammad S/o Bali Mohammad, Aged About 66 Years, R/o Mohalla Jamalpura Gumat Town Badi, Tehasil Badi. 3. Swale Mohammad S/o Bali Mohammad, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Mohalla Jamalpura Gumat Town Badi Tehasil Badi. 4. Mustak Ahmed S/o Bali Mohamad, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Mohalla Jamalpura Gumat Town Badi Tehasil Badi. 5. Asfak Ahmed S/o Bali Mohammad, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Mohalla Jamalpura Gumat Town Badi, Tehasil Badi. 6. Mehaboob Khan S/o Bali Mohammad, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Mohalla Jamalpura Gumat Town Badi Tehasil Badi. 7. Shameema Begam D/o Bali Mohammad W/o Chaman Alias Jaheeruddin, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Jalesar District Eta, Uttarpradesh. 8. Jaibun Nisha W/o Saed Mohammad, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Mohalla Jamalpura Gumat Town Badi Tehasil Badi District Dholpur. 9. Sadik S/o Saed Mohammad, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Mohalla Jamalpura Gumat Town Badi Tehasil Badi District Dholpur. 10. Farid Khan S/o Saed Mohammad, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Mohalla Jamalpura Gumat Town Badi, Tehasil Badi District Dholpur. 11. Anabari Alias Rubi D/o Saed Mohmmad W/o Saleem, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Kheragarh District Agra. 12. Shabeena D/o Saed Mohammad W/o Firoz, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Kamal Khan Agra District Agra. [2026:RJ-JP:14013] (2 of 2) [CW-6015/2026] 13. Savana D/o Saed Mohammad W/o Pappu, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Jalesar District Eta Uttarprdesh. 14. State Of Rajasthan Through Tehasildar, Tehasil Badi District Dholpur. ----Respondents/Defendants For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sachin Kumar For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 06/04/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks an innocuous prayer that directions be issued to learned Trial Court to decide the suit for partition which has been pending since 2024 as expeditiously as possible. 2. Considered. 3. This Court deems it appropriate to direct the learned Trial Court to decide the suit as expeditiously as possible. Further, if the suit filed prior to the year 2024 is not pending before it, priority shall be given to the present matter; otherwise, no such priority shall be granted. 4. With the above observation, the present civil writ petition stand disposed of. 5. All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J KRATIKA /19