Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 /
2026:CGHC:12489
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 14186 of 2025 Maheshwar Kumar Dhruv S/o Shri Tula Ram Dhruv Aged About 27 Years Occupation Peon, Vivekanand Vidyapeeth, Permanent R/o Ghatkara Post Pond Paduka PS Rajim Tah Chura, Distt Gariyaband (C.G.) At Present Vivekanand Vidyapeeth, Post Raipur, Distt Raipur (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary, Department Of School Education Mantralaya, Mahannadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Ps Abhanpur, Distt Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Public Instruction Director, Indrawati Bhawan Atal Nagar New Raipur, Distt Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Collector Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - District Education Officer Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Secretary Vivekanand Vidyapeeth, Kota, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Ms. Deepali Pandey, Advocate For State : Ms. Apurva Nigam, Panel Lawyer Digitally signed by PRAVEEN KUMAR SINHA Date: 2026.03.18 11:39:18 +0530
2 / S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
Order on Board 16/03/2026
1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:
"(i) Issue a writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents
to
forthwith
consider
and appoint/promote the Petitioner on the vacant Scheduled Tribe-reserved post of Assistant Grade-III (LDC) in accordance with the Rules; (ii) Direct the Respondents to decide the Petitioner's representation dated 12.09.2025 within a time-bound period, preferably within 30 days; (iii) Grant all consequential benefits including seniority, pay fixation and arrears, from the date the post became available or from such date as this Hon'ble Court deems fit; (iv) Declare that the continued vacancy of ST- reserved LDC post since 2013 and non-consideration of the eligible Petitioner is illegal and violative of Articles 14, 16(1), 16(4) and 21 of the Constitution of India; (v) Any other order(s) deemed fit in the interests of justice."
2.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner was engaged on daily wage basis on the post of Peon in the year 2006. Petitioner continuously worked as daily wage employee and thereafter he was regularized in service in the year 2020. Petitioner became eligible for promotion to the post of Assistant Grade-III . Posts are also lying vacant in the department. However, when petitioner was not
3 / considered for promotion, he submitted representation before respondents on 12.09.2025 but till date said representation is also not considered and decided and therefore a direction be issued to concerned authority to take decision on the claim of petitioner by deciding the representation within specified time frame.
3.
Learned counsel for the State submits that in view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner she is having no objection.
4. On due consideration of submissions of learned counsel for the respective parties, nature of grievance raised, representation submitted by petitioner is pending consideration as submitted by petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondents to take decision on the pending representation of the petitioner dated 12.09.2025, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
5. Petitioner will also be at liberty to submit fresh representation if he so desires and if such representation is submitted, concerned authority shall consider and take decision on the representation to be submitted by petitioner along with pending representation. Sd/-/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Praveen