DALVIR SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRM-M/37318/2026 · 2026-07-27
Alok Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34610 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34610 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE (124) DALVIR SINGH AND OTHERS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM:
Present:
ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral)
1. official respondents to consider and decide 03.02.2026 and to register FIR against the private respondents. 2. to issue any direction, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present alternative remedy in accordance with law. 3. withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. on the merits of the case. The liberty granted has been extended solely at the request of learned counsel for the petitioners and shall not be construed as any direction or expression of opinion by this Court. July 27, 2026 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
DALVIR SINGH AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN
****
Ms. Kirti Sharma, Advocate for
Mr. Tarun Seth, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral)
The present petition has been filed seeking directions to official respondents to consider and decide 03.02.2026 and to register FIR against the private respondents. After arguing for some time, when this Court was not inclined to issue any direction, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail of the appropriate alternative remedy in accordance with law. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any on the merits of the case. The liberty granted has been extended solely at the request of learned counsel for the petitioners and shall not be construed as any direction or expression of opinion by this Court. July 27, 2026
Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-37318-2026 Date of Decision:- 27.07.2026 ……Petitioners ……Respondents ALOK JAIN Kirti Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Tarun Seth, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab. The present petition has been filed seeking directions to official respondents to consider and decide the representation dated 03.02.2026 and to register FIR against the private respondents.
After arguing for some time, when this Court was not inclined to issue any direction, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission petition with liberty to avail of the appropriate
In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. The liberty granted has been extended solely at the request of learned counsel for the petitioners and shall not be construed as any direction or expression of opinion by this Court. (ALOK JAIN)
JUDGE
27.07.2026 ……Petitioners ……Respondents
The present petition has been filed seeking directions to the representation dated After arguing for some time, when this Court was not inclined to issue any direction, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission petition with liberty to avail of the appropriate In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as opinion on the merits of the case. The liberty granted has been extended solely at the request of learned counsel for the petitioners and shall not be construed MANJU 2026.07.29 11:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document