RIPUL TYAGI ALIAS RIPUL SANU ALIAS RIPUL ALIAS SANU v. STATE OF HARYANA
CRM-M/36919/2026 · 2026-07-29
Vikram Aggarwal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34601 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34601 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
REKHA SHARMA 2026.07.30 03:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
-2-
5.
Per contra, IO has opposed the bail application stating that a very serious offence is alleged to have been committed by the petitioner, who in the dead of the night along with his friends, intercepted a car and beat up the occupants of the same. He submits that the complainant is yet to be examined and if the petitioner is released on bail, he may try to threaten and influence the said witness. He further submits that five other FIRs stand registered against the petitioner. On a query raised by the Court, the IO submits that most of the FIRs are under Section 323 IPC.
6.
I have considered the submissions made by Mr. Puneet Tyagi and IO-Naseem.
7.
Co-accused-Rahul Klair has been granted regular bail vide order dated The petitioner is also suffering from fracture as has been noticed in the medical certificate (Annexure P-6).
REKHA SHARMA 2026.07.30 03:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
-3-
The petitioner is in custody since 16.03.2026 and more than four months have elapsed. The incident took place at the spur of the moment. The injuries on the person of the complainant were simple injuries. Final report stands submitted. Charges stand framed. Trial will, therefore, take a sufficiently long time and in the considered opinion of the Court, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody any longer.
8.
Rekha REKHA SHARMA 2026.07.30 03:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh