Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010016942023 NC: 2026:KHC:41905 W.P. No.696/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.696/2023 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. NEELAMBIKE W/O LATE S. NEELAKANTAIAH AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS.
2.
B.N. NANDISH S/O LATE S. NEELAKANTAIAH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS.
3.
B.N. VIJAY S/O LATE S. NEELAKANTAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.
SR. NOS.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT NO.664, 7TH A MAIN NAGARBHAVI 2ND STAGE, 9TH BLOCK NEAR BANDE MARAMMA TEMPLE BENGALURU - 560 071.
4.
SMT. B.N. MANJULA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS D/O LATE S. NEELAKANTAIAH W/O SREEKANTH SHARMA R/AT NO.1037, 4TH M BLOCK DR. RAJKUMAR ROAD, RAJAJINAGAR BENGALURU - 560 010. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. GANGAIAH, ADV.,)
Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010016942023 NC: 2026:KHC:41905 W.P. No.696/2023
AND:
1.
G.S. MANJUNATHA S/O LATE SHIVANNA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS NO.18, MANJUNTHA NILAYA 1ST MAIN, GEETHA CLINIC RAD 6TH CROSS, DEVASANDRA K.R. PURAM, BENGALURU - 560 036.
2.
G.S. SURESHA S/O LATE SHIVANNA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS NO.205, DEVASANDRA BAGALUR MAIN YELAHANKA, BENGALURU-560063.
3.
CANARA BANK VIJAYANAGARA BRANCH BENGALURU - 560 040 REP. BY ITS MANAGER. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SREENIVASA K.L. ADV., FOR K.N.L. ASSTS., FOR R1 & R2 R3 SERVED)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH ORDER DATED 15.11.2022 PASSED IN IA NO.25 IN OS.4864/2003 ON THE FILE OF THE XIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-28) AT ANNEXURE-G. IN VIEW OF THE JUDGMENT PASSED IN WP 36350/2017 AND 37532-37533 OF 2017 DT.24TH OCTOBER 2017 (ANNEXURE-A) AND JUDGMENT IN WP 36349/2017 DT.6TH APRIL 2022 AT ANNEXURE-B & ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010016942023 NC: 2026:KHC:41905 W.P. No.696/2023
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition. The memo reads as under:
“The Advocate for petitioner submits that connected matter WP.No.20423/2022 is allowed by this Honourable Court. Therefore, the petitioner prays this Honourable Court to permit to withdraw this writ petition in the interest of justice.”
2. In view of the aforesaid memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE
ABK List No.: 3 Sl No.: 1