- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010696622024 NC: 2026:KHC:40395 WP No. 32424 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 32424 OF 2024 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: SRI. Y.N.CHANDRU, S/O. LATE NINGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, YELIYURU VILLAGE, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571 402 KARNATAKA …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MADHUKAR S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. CANARA BANK YELIYURU BRANCH EARLIER KNOWN AS SYNDICATE BANK, OPP. YELIYURU RAILWAY STATION, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571 402 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER'S I) SRI. R.MATHIVANNAN AND II) K.L.SHILPA BRANCH MANAGER 2. SRI. R.MATHIVANNAN DIVISIONAL MANAGER AND AUTHORIZED OFFICER OF CANARA BANK REGIONAL OFFICE AT NO.1123, ARALE SANGAPPA COMPLEX, M.C.ROAD, MANDYA-571 401 KARNATAKA. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010696622024 NC: 2026:KHC:40395 WP No. 32424 of 2024 3. SMT. K.L.SHILPA, BRANCH MANAGER, CANARA BANK, YELIYURU BRANCH, OPP. YELIYURU RAILWAY STATION, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571 402 KARNATAKA. 4. ANTARES SYSTEMS LIMITED "HONGANASU" NO.137/3, BENGALURU, MYSURU ROAD, OPP. METRO PILLER NO.P-696, KENGERI, BENGALURU-560060. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIGNESH SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Madhukar S., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Vignesh Shetty, counsel for the respondent No.1 appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010696622024 NC: 2026:KHC:40395 WP No. 32424 of 2024 taken about the infructuous of the petition and if an order is passed the petitioner shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order. The oral submission is placed on record. As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the infructuous of the petition, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32