1 / 2 CGHC010232782021 2026:CGHC:38957 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3747 of 2021 1. Punaram Devdas S/o Firturam Aged About 50 Years Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Paunsari (Hathband),block Simga, Police Station Suhela, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 2. Lalit Verma S/o Bhagwat Prasad Verma Aged About 48 Years Up-Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Paunsari (Hathband), block Simga, Police Station Suhela, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 3. Chain Singh Nishad S/o Sukhau Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Paunsari (Hathband),block Simga, Police Station Suhela, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 4. Rajkamal Rajgond S/o Chakradhari Aged About 37 Years R/o Village Paunsari (Hathband),block Simga, Police Station Suhela, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 5. Dev Kumar Dhruw S/o Rajendra Dhruw, Panch Aged About 23 Years R/o Village Paunsari (Hathband), block Simga, Police Station Suhela, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 6. Manglu Alias Jethuram Nishad S/o Late Jethwa Aged About 71 Years R/o Village Paunsari (Hathband), block Simga, Police Station Suhela, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners versus 1. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Simga District Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh, 2. Neera Sahu W/o Tijau Sahu Aged About 50 Years President, Jai Maa Durga Society Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh,paunsari (Hathband),block Simga, Police Station Suhela, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : None. For Respondent- State : Mr. Rajkumar Sahu, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA 2 / 2 02/09/2026 1. Earlier this case was listed on 02.11.2022, 03.08.2026 and on 11.08.2026. On the said dates, no one appeared on behalf of petitioners to press this writ petition. Today also, even when in the second round the case is called for hearing, there is no appearance for petitioner. 2. In the aforementioned facts of the case, it appears that petitioners have lost interest in pursuing this writ petition and therefore this court is left with no other option but to dismiss this writ petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) pwn JUDGE