KISHAN KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/17571/2026 · 2026-05-05
Manish Kumar Nigam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3459 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3459 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17571 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Sharad Chand Rai, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5, learned Standing Counsel for State- respondents and perused the record.
2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer:
"issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 07.02.2026 passed by the Commissioner Aligarh Division Aligarh/ respondent no- 2. (Annexure No- 1 to this writ petition)."
3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing revision against the order impugned.
4. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the instant petition.
5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available to him under law.
6. Certified copy of the orders, if any, be returned to learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining photo copy of the same. May 6, 2026 Ved Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Madan Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sharad Chand Rai (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Kishan Kumar And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad