Palani @ Mallarpalani @ Palanisamy v. The State of Tamilnadu, rep by The Tahsildar/Executive Magistrate
CRL OP(MD)/7252/2026 · 2026-06-04
R Vijayakumar
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34588 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34588 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.06.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Crl.OP.(MD)No.7252 of 2026 and Crl.M.P(MD)No.7791 of 2026 Palani @ Mallarpalani @ Palanisamy ...Petitioner Vs
1. The State of Tamilnadu,
Rep. by the Tahsildar/Executive Magistrate, Avudaiyarkovil Taluk, Pudukottai District. 2. State of Tamilnadu,
Rep. by Inspector of Police, Avudaiyarkoil Police Station, Pudukottai District. ...Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, to call for the records relating to the proceedings in Na.Ka.No.273/2026/A9 dated 04.03.2026 on the file of the 1st respondent quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : M/s.J.Vishnu For Respondents : M/s.P.Samuel Gunasingh
Counsel for State of TN(Crl.side) * * * * *
1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
ORDER The present petition has been filed seeking to quash the summons issued under Section 129 of BNSS. 2. According to the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, he is involved in 3 criminal cases and the same is pending and he has not been convicted in any one of the criminal cases. 3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner relies upon a decision of this Court in Crl.OP(MD)No.20725 of 2021, dated 11.01.2022, M.Thangamalai and 2 others, Vs. Sub Divisional Executive Magistrate cum Revenue Divisional Officer and another, wherein this Court was pleased to hold that only when the person is declared as the habitual offender as contemplated under Section 2(4) of Tamil Nadu Restriction of Habitual Offenders Act, 1948, Section 129 can be invoked. 4. I have considered the submissions made on either side and perused the materials available on record. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
5. As rightly pointed out by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, so far he has not been convicted in any one of the criminal cases and therefore, the petitioner would not fall within the definition of habitual offender as contemplated under Section 2(4) of the Tamil Nadu Restriction of Habitual Offenders Act, 1948 and in such circumstances, the summons have been issued under Section 129 of BNSS without any jurisdiction and therefore, the same is liable to be quashed. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. 04.06.2026 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No RJR 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
To
1. The Tahsildar/Executive Magistrate, Avudaiyarkovil Taluk, Pudukottai District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Avudaiyarkoil Police Station, Pudukottai District. Copy to:- The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
R.VIJAYAKUMAR
, J.
RJR
Crl.OP.(MD)No.7252 of 2026 04.06.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis