IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.10028 of 2026 Rabinarayan Mishra …. Petitioner Mr. L. Samal, Advocate -versus- Additional Central Provident Fund Commissioner, New Delhi & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. C.K. Pradhan, AGA COROM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 08.04.2026 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for appearing for the Parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore prayed that your Lordships would be graciously pleased to direct the Opp.party No.2 to release the revised enhanced pension in favour of the petitioner after getting return of differential amount i.e. difference between 8.33% of actual salary and 8.33% of selling amount with interest as the petitioner was retired from service prior to 01.09.2014 i.e. on 31.03.2014; proper; AND/OR pass such other order/ orders deemed fit and And for this act of your Lordship's kindness the petitioners as in justice duty bound shall ever pray.”. 4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting her grievance, Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.2 vide Annexure-5 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection. 5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after p. 2 p. 2 going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.2 to consider the representation filed by the Petitioner vide Annexure-5 within a period of three (3) months in accordance with law from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat