Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34563 (PNJ)

MS M K CONTRACTOR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/22209/2026 · 2026-07-21

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-22209-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 138 CWP-22209-2026 Date of Decision: 21.07.2026 M/s M.K. Contractor …Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- Mr. Sandeep Bhatia, Advocate, and Mr. Kamal Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Bhupender Singh, Additional Advocate General, Haryana TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to release the outstanding amount against 76 bills, detailed in para 5 of the petition, amounting to ₹21,44,034 as well as security deposit, along with interest. 2. Learned State counsel, on instructions from Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Executive Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Division-2, Sirsa, submits that the aforementioned bills as well as security amount will be cleared and the sanctioned amount will be credited to the petitioner’s account within three months from today. 3. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. PAYAL 2026.07.27 09:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-22209-2026 -2- 4. Ordered accordingly. 5. In case the sanctioned amount is not credited to the petitioner’s account within the stipulated period, it shall carry interest at the rate of twelve per cent per annum from expiry of the said period till actual payment. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 21.07.2026 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAYAL 2026.07.27 09:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment