IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (136) CWP No. 23213 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 28.07.2026 Balihar ...Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: Mr. Tanheer Singh Bariana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikram Bajaj, Senior Panel Counsel for the respondent-UOI *** Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently, the enquiry report could not be challenged before the Central Administrative Tribunal (for short ‘Tribunal’) hence, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy, in case available, to challenge the said enquiry report before the appropriate forum. 2. Ordered accordingly. 3. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stands disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) July 28, 2026 JUDGE kanchan Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No KANCHAN 2026.07.29 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment