ANNASAHEB NATHA KHEMNAR v. BALU TUKARAM LONDHE AND ANOTHER
CA/8137/2026 · 2026-08-20
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3455 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3455 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 1 ) 987 ca 8137.26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 987 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8137 OF 2026 IN SAST/10843/2026 ANNASAHEB NATHA KHEMNAR VERSUS BALU TUKARAM LONDHE AND ANOTHER ….. Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Yogesh H. Lagad …..
CORAM :
SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 20.08.2026 P.C.:-
1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 16 days caused in filing the application and for restoration of appeal to its original position.
2. Perused the application. Heard the learned advocate for applicant.
3. On perusal of the application, it appears that the delay has not been deliberately caused. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the delay deserves to be condoned, subject to removal of office objections office objections.
4. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay stands condoned. The application for restoration stands allowed in the interest of 2026:BHC-AUG:38037
( 2 ) 987 ca 8137.26 justice. The impugned order dated 17.06.2026 is set aside. Appeal is restored to its original position. Appeal:
5. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 08.10.2026. Call record and proceedings.
[SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.]
mubashir