Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34547 (PNJ)

DALWANTI AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/23154/2026 · 2026-07-28

Jagmohan Bansal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 139 CWP-23154-2026 Date of Decision: 28.07.2026 DALWANTI AND OTHERS ...Petitioners Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. …Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Divyam Singh, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Sr. Advocate/Addl. A.G. Haryana with Mr. Akash Choudhary, Advocate *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking direction to respondents to release full amount of annual annuity along with interest and arrears as per award dated 11.09.2012. They are further seeking direction to respondents to decide their representation dated 10.03.2026 in a time bound manner. 2. The petitioners claim that respondents vide award dated 11.09.2012 acquired their land. They were awarded compensation of ₹108 crores 55 lakhs approximately. They were further held entitled to annuity scheme @ ₹21,000/- per acre per annum for a period of 33 years as per Government policy dated 28.04.2008. The respondent has not released annuity despite expiry of 14 years. 3. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that petitioners are entitled to annuity as per award dated 11.09.2012 read with judgment dated DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.07.28 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-23154-2026 -2- 20.12.2023 passed by this Court in CWP no.16737 of 2023 titled as “Om Parkash and Others Versus State of Haryana and Others”, Law Finder Doc Id # 2521859 and order dated 28.11.2025 passed by this Court in CWP No.33780 of 2024 titled as “Bijender Singh and Others Versus State of Haryana and Others”. 4. Learned State counsel expressed his inability to controvert applicability of aforesaid judgments to present case. 5. In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of in terms of order dated 28.11.2025 (Annexure P-6). 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE July 28, 2026 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.07.28 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment