DALWANTI AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/23154/2026 · 2026-07-28
Jagmohan Bansal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34547 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34547 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
**** 139
CWP-23154-2026 Date of Decision: 28.07.2026
DALWANTI AND OTHERS ...Petitioners Vs.
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
…Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:- Mr. Divyam Singh, Advocate for the petitioners
Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Sr. Advocate/Addl. A.G. Haryana with
Mr. Akash Choudhary, Advocate
*** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1.
The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking direction to respondents to release full amount of annual annuity along with interest and arrears as per award dated 11.09.2012. They are further seeking direction to respondents to decide their representation dated 10.03.2026 in a time bound manner.
2.
The petitioners claim that respondents vide award dated 11.09.2012 acquired their land. They were awarded compensation of ₹108 crores 55 lakhs approximately. They were further held entitled to annuity scheme @ ₹21,000/- per acre per annum for a period of 33 years as per Government policy dated 28.04.2008. The respondent has not released annuity despite expiry of 14 years.
3.
Learned counsel for petitioners submits that petitioners are entitled to annuity as per award dated 11.09.2012 read with judgment dated DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.07.28 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
CWP-23154-2026
-2-
20.12.2023 passed by this Court in CWP no.16737 of 2023 titled as “Om Parkash and Others Versus State of Haryana and Others”, Law Finder Doc Id # 2521859 and order dated 28.11.2025 passed by this Court in CWP No.33780 of 2024 titled as “Bijender Singh and Others Versus State of Haryana and Others”.
4.
Learned State counsel expressed his inability to controvert applicability of aforesaid judgments to present case.
5.
In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands
disposed of in terms of order dated 28.11.2025 (Annexure P-6).
6.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE July 28, 2026 Deepak DPA
Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable
Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.07.28 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment