Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3454 (JK)

SHRI RAM v. U T OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPTT AND OTHERS

WP(C)/2515/2022 · 2026-09-28

Ma Chowdhary

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 2515/2022 Shri Ram, Age 60 years, S/O Krishan Lal, R/O Ward No. 2, Mangnar, Tehsil Haveli, District Poonch. …..Petitioner Through: Ms. Arsha Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advocate. Vs 1. UT of J&K through Commissioner/Secretary to Govt., Industries & Commerce Department, Jammu. 2. Deputy Commissioner, Poonch, Near Airstrip, Poonch, Sheesh Mohalla, Poonch City, Poonch. 3. Director, Geology & Mining Department, Jammu. 4. Jammu & Kashmir Pollution Control Board, through its secretary, Parivesh Bhawan, Forest Complex, Gladni, Narwal Jammu. 5. Director Industries & Commerce, Jammu. 6. Block Medical Officer, Poonch. 7. Executive Engineer, PWD, (R&B) PHE. Poonch. 8. Executive Engineer, Flood Control Division, Poonch. 9. Chief Education Officer, Poonch. 10. Ghulam Nabi Mir, S/O Not Known, R/O Mangnar Lower, Tehsil and Serial No. 19 2 WP(C) No. 2515/2022 District Poonch. .…. Respondents Through: Mr. Deewakar Sharma, Dy. AG for R- 1, 3 & 5. Ms. Nisha Kangotra, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG for R-2 & 8. Ms. Meenakshi Salathia, Dy. AG for R-4 (Through Virtual Mode). Ms. Jagmeet Kour, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG for R-6. Ms. Pallvi Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG for R-7. Mr. Fahim Ahmed Dar, Adv for R-10. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MA CHOWDHARY, JUDGE ORDER (28.09.2026) 1. On perusal of the petition, it appears that the main grievance raised by the petitioner was with regard to the grant of consent/NOC in favour of respondent No. 10 for installation of a stone crusher. 2. In view of the withdrawal of the consent granted by the Pollution Control Committee vide Order No. 08-JKPCC/22 dated 28.11.2022, the grievance raised in the petition does not survive. The petition has, therefore, been rendered infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous, along with connected application(s). (MA CHOWDHARY) JUDGE JAMMU 28.09.2026 Sneha 3 WP(C) No. 2515/2022