HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5328 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard. 2. In view of the order which is being proposed to be passed, notices are not being issued to the respondent. 3. The sole relief claimed in the present petition is for a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division)/ F.T.C., Bareilly to execute the sale deed and decide the Execution Case No. 10 of 2022 (Smt. Surajmukhi Vs. Smt. Vidyawati) pending before him. 4. Since the above-mentioned case is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division)/ F.T.C., Bareilly to execute the sale deed and decide the Execution Case No. 10 of 2022 (Smt. Surajmukhi Vs. Smt. Vidyawati) pending before him, in accordance with law, expeditiously without granting unnecessary adjournment provided there is no other legal impediment. May 6, 2026 Rajesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amar Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Smt Surajmukhi .....Petitioner(s) Smt Vidyawati .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad