2026:UHC:2777 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL/666/2026 With Compounding Appl. No. 1 of 2026 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Ms. Rangoli Purohit, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. Ankush Singhal, learned counsel for the respondent. 4. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing of FIR dated 01.03.2026, bearing FIR No. 33 of 2026, registered at P.S. Pulbhatta District Udham Singh Nagar wherein the petitioner has been implicated for the offences punishable under Section 351(3), 69 of BNS 2023. 5. The petition is filed along with the compounding application (IA No. 1 of 2026) with the affidavit of the petitioner and respondent no. 4. The petitioner and respondent no. 4 are present in Court and are identified by their respective counsel. 6. It is contended in the compounding application that after registration of the FIR the petitioner as well as respondent no. 4/complainant settled their dispute and decided to marry with each other and thereafter they both married in “Gurudwara Shri Singh Sabha, Village Pipliya, P.O. Shakti Farm, Tehsil Sitarganj District U.S. Nagar” on 04.04.2026 and the certificate issued by Granthi of Gurudwara dated 04.04.2026, is enclosed as annexure no. 1. In support of age, school leaving certificate and Aadhar Card have been enclosed on perusal of which it reveals that both the petitioner and respondent no. 4 are major and attained the age of marriage. 7. Respondent no. 4/complainant is present in Court and she also submits that she does not want to pursue with the impugned FIR since she already marry with the petitioner. 2026:UHC:2777 8. Ms. Rangoli Purohit, learned Brief Holder for the State have not disputed about the age of the petitioner and respondent no. 4 as well as have not disputed about their marriage and submits that since the petitioner married with respondent no. 4, therefore, at this juncture there is no need to go with the further investigation. 9. After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that petitioner now married with the complainant and living happily and she does not want to pursue with the impugned FIR, therefore, this Court is of the view that the writ petition and the compounding application deserves to be allowed. 10. Accordingly, the instant writ petition and the compounding application are allowed. The impugned FIR is hereby quashed. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 17.04.2026 Parul 2026:UHC:2777