Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3453 (MAD)

Ganesh v. State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,

CRL OP/8588/2026 · 2026-04-07

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 8588 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 8588 of 2026 1. Ganesh S/o.Narsingam, No.410 B Type 2, Block 29, Kurinjipadi Taluk, Neyveli Post, Block -29, Neyveli District. Cuddalore - 607 807. 2. S.Chitra W/o. Ganesan, No.410 B Type 2, Block 29, Kurinjipadi Taluk, Neyveli Post, Block -29, Neyveli District. Cuddalore - 607 807. 3. Prakash @ Sivaprakash S/o. Ramachandiran, No.15/14, North Street, North Seplanatham, Neyveli - 2, Sepalanatham Post, Sepalanatham District, Cuddalore - 607 802. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Thirunavalur Police Station, Ulundurpet Taluk. ..Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 8588 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest in Crime No.722 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police and pass such further or other orders. For Petitioner(s): Manojkumar A For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioners apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS, in Crime No.722 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners abused the de facto complainant in filthy language, assaulted him and his mother, and threatened them with dire consequences. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners had already obtained anticipatory bail from the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kallakurichi, in Crl.M.P.No.325 of 2026, vide order dated 05.03.2026, wherein the Court granted them time to surrender within a period of two weeks. However, they were not in a position to surrender within the stipulated time. Hence, he prayed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 8588 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 4. In such circumstances, the petitioners are directed to move an appropriate application for extension of time. 5. With the above direction, the present petition is disposed of. If any such application is filed, the same shall be disposed of in accordance with law and on its own merits, without being influenced by any of the observations made in this order. 07-04-2026 MPA To 1. The Inspector of Police, Thirunavalur Police Station, Ulundurpet Taluk. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 8588 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. MPA CRL OP No. 8588 of 2026 07-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis