- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19633 RSA No. 652 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 652 OF 2020 (DEC) BETWEEN: MR NIREN JAIN AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, S/O MR V K JAIN R/O VIJAYAVANA MUKRAMPADY KEMMINJE VILLAGE - 574 201 PUTTUR TALUK D.K (GPA HOLDER V K JAIN S/O K K HEGDE, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT: VIJAYAVANA, MUKRAMPADY, DARBE, PUTTUR D.K - 574 201. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SANGAMESH., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. CHANDRANATH ARIGA K.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR JOHN LOBO AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, S/O LATE PETER LOBO KEMMINJE VILLAGE, PUTTUR TALUK D.K - 574 201. 2. MRS MATILDA RODRIGUS AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, W/O SIMON RODRIGUS R/O KEMMINJE VILLAGE - 574 201 PUTTUR TALUK D.K. DISTRICT Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19633 RSA No. 652 of 2020 3. LEENA MIRANDA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS W/O WALTER MIRANDA STAFF NURSE K C G HOSPITAL MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE - 560 003. …RESPONDENTS (NOTICE TO R1 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED; V/O DTD: 5/9/23, NOTICE BELOW CAUSE TITLE I.E., R2 AND R3 WERE NOT A PARTIES BEFORE FAC IS ACCEPTED) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.10.2019 PASSED IN RA.NO.10/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM, PUTTUR TALUK D.K. DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.08.2018 PASSED IN O.S.NO.116/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JDUGE AND JMFC, PUTTUR D.K. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking to withdraw this Regular Second Appeal, which reads as under: " The appellant seeks permission to withdraw the above appeal. The appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn." - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19633 RSA No. 652 of 2020 2. Office has raised an objection that the memo is not signed by the GPA holder of the appellant. Since the memo for withdrawal is signed by the appellant, the memo for withdrawal is taken on record. 3. In view of the memo, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- _____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA PHM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9