Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010414312025
2026:CGHC:38725
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 11430 of 2025 1 - Santosh Kumar Dubey S/o Late M. L. Dubey Aged About 67 Years R/o Karmchari Colony Kushalpur Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Accountant General Zero Point, Balodabazaar Road Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Divisional Joint Director Treasury Account And Pension Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Deputy Commissioner Raipur- Division, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Commissioner Raipur- Division, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Collector Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 7 - Joint Collector Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondents (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner : Mr. Krishna Tandon, Advocate For Respondents/State : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Dy.G.A. For Respective Respondent : Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate Hon'ble Shri
Bibhu Datta Guru
, Judge
Order on Board AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2026.09.02 10:40:37 +0530
2 01.09.2026
1. By way of present petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction towards the respondents authorities to settle the grievance of the petition regarding the payment of pension.
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing of the present petition, though the payment of pension to the petitioner has been started, but the quantum of pension is objectionable to him as there is some factual dispute between the petitioner and respondents regarding the said quantum of pension. Hence, he seeks to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to raise grievance of the petitioner before the High Power Pension Redressal Committee.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondents has not opposes the submission made by learned counsel for the respondents.
4. In view of the above, the office of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the petition from the petitioner and this order. The Committee shall consider and pass a reasoned order within a further period of 3 months, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the parties. The petitioner and the officers concerned may file additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including retiral dues of the employee and other pensionary benefits, if any,
3 to the petitioner be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
5. The petitioner shall supply extra copy of the petition to learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents for forwarding the same to the Committee.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. SD/-
(Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Amardeep