- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20341 CRL.RP No. 1006 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.1006 OF 2022 (397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS) BETWEEN: NANJUNDA S/O LATE LINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT CHENNARAYAPATANA DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT- - 562 135 …PETITIONER (BY SRI HEMANTHA B, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. ASHWATHAMMA W/O M KRISHNAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT NO.2, K K MEADOWS APARTMENT NEAR OLD POLICE STATION BEGLUR VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI BENGALURU NORTH ADDITIONAL TALUK BENGALURU - 562149 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA N R, ADVOCATE) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 07.11.2019 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE XX ACMM, BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.18212/2018 AND CONFIRMED BY THE HON’BLE LXV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU IN CRL.A.NO.207/2021 DATED 09.12.2021, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED XX ACMM, BENGALURU AND ACQUIT THE PETITIONER. Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20341 CRL.RP No. 1006 of 2022 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Joint memo is filed which reads as under: “The counsel for the above named petitioner and respondent most humbly submit as follows: 1. The respondent has filed a complaint u/S 138 of NI Act and the petitioner was convicted and sentenced to pay sum of Rs.3,15,000/- vide order dated 07.11.2019. 2. After convicted before the trial court the accused /petitioner has challenged the conviction and sentence before the Hon’ble Sessions Judge in Crl.Appeal No.207/2021. But learned Sessions Judge dismissed the appeal and confirm the judgment of Trial Court. Therefore, the petitioner appeared before this Hon’ble Court. 3. During pendency of above revision petition the petitioner and the respondent were settled the matter before the trial court and the petitioner has settled the entire fine amount to the respondent. And there is no due from the petitioner. But the petitioner nor the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20341 CRL.RP No. 1006 of 2022 respondent unable to reported the same before this Hon’ble Court. WHEREFORE, it is prays that this Hon’ble court be pleased to close the above petition in the interest of justice.” 2. Placing the joint memo on record, revision petition stands disposed of. 3. Amount in deposit, if any, is ordered to be withdrawn by the complainant under due identification. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6