1 CGHC010319312026 2026:CGHC:38574 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2249 of 2026 Vishnu Nirmalkar S/o Shri M.L. Nirmalkar Aged About 59 Years Authorized Representative Of Ruchi Soya Industries Limited, Ruchi Infrastructure Ltd And Nova Trading Pvt. Ltd, And Vyapar Vihar, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Shrivastava, Senior Advocate alongwith Mr. Yagyawalkya Singh, Advocate as well as Ms. Akriti Singh, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Ms. Anusha Naik, Dy. Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 01.09.2026 1. This petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed seeking correction of the inadvertent clerical error in the order dated 20.07.2026 passed by this Court in CRR No. 522/2011, wherein the appearance has been mentioned as “Mr. Rajeev Shrivastava, Senior Advocate, assisted by Ms. Akriti Singh, Advocate, for the Petitioner”, whereas the correct appearance is “Mr. Rajeev Shrivastava, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Yagyawalkya Singh, Advocate, for the Petitioner”. KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the order dated 20.07.2026 passed by this Court in CRR No. 522/2011, the appearance of learned counsel for the petitioner has inadvertently been recorded as “Mr. Rajeev Shrivastava, Senior Advocate, assisted by Ms. Akriti Singh, Advocate, for the Petitioner”, whereas the correct appearance ought to have been recorded as “Mr. Rajeev Shrivastava, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Yagyawalkya Singh, Advocate, for the Petitioner”. It is, therefore, prayed that the aforesaid inadvertent clerical error may kindly be corrected. 3. Considering the nature of the correction sought and the record of the case, the prayer made in the present petition appears to be just and reasonable. 4. Accordingly, the order dated 20.07.2026 passed in CRR No. 522/2011 is to be modified to the limited extent that the appearance recorded as “Mr. Rajeev Shrivastava, Senior Advocate, assisted by Ms. Akriti Singh, Advocate, for the Petitioner” shall be read as “Mr. Rajeev Shrivastava, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Yagyawalkya Singh, Advocate, for the Petitioner”. 5. It is made clear that except the aforesaid correction, no other part of the order dated 20.07.2026 shall stand altered or modified. 6. With the aforesaid correction, the present petition stands disposed of. 7. Copy of this order be placed along with the main order dated 20.07.2026 passed in CRR No. 522/2011. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal