- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010014122024 NC: 2026:KHC:44639 WP No. 940 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 940 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. RAJEGOWDA S/O LATE THAMMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/A THELAGINAKOPPA VILLAGE KOMALAPURA POST, RAVANDURU HOBLI PERIYAPATTANA TALUK MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 107. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJARAM SOORYAMBAIL, ADVOCATE AND SRI. MAMATHA M.R, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE THASILDAR PERIYAPATTANA TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 107. 2. SRI. YOGESH S/O SANNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/A MALLINATHAPURA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, PERIYAPATTANA TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 107. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SURYA MUKUNDARAJ L, ADDL. SPP FOR R1; SRI. MOHAN N, ADVOCATE FOR R2) Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010014122024 NC: 2026:KHC:44639 WP No. 940 of 2024 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DATED 27/12/2023 BEARING NO. L.N.D.C.R (Ra) 158/23-24 FOUND AT ANNEXURE-A ISSUED BY THE R1 AND ALLOW THIS WP WITH COST AND GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEFS AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Challenging notice dated 27.12.2023 issued by respondent no.1, at Annexure-A, this petition is filed. 2. Sri N.Mohan, learned counsel for respondent no.2 has filed a Memo stating that matter has been rendered infructuous as an order was passed on 09.01.2024 by respondent no.1, with participation of petitioner. It was submitted that in case petitioner was aggrieved by said order, he would require to challenge same in separate proceedings. 3. Sri Rajaram Sooryambail, learned counsel submits that he has obtained 'No Objection' on behalf of petitioner and undertakes to file vakalath for petitioner. He is unable to - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010014122024 NC: 2026:KHC:44639 WP No. 940 of 2024 controvert contents of Memo filed by respondent. Though he seeks time, since it is noted that an impugned show-cause notice has progressed and an order is passed in said proceedings, challenge against show-cause notice at this stage would not be sustainable. 4. Reserving liberty to petitioner to challenge order in appropriate proceedings and keeping open all contentions, Petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7