Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3447 (CAL)

SHRI. SAMEER IQBAL BAJAJ v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND ORS

WPA/104/2026 · 2026-03-19

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA [ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ] *** WPA/104/2026 Shri. Sameer Iqbal Bajaj Vs. The Deputy Commissioner and ors. Mr. A.S. Zinu … for the petitioner Mr. V.D. Sivabalan ... for the respondents March 19, 2026 [SR] Item No.6 Learned advocate for the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the Rent Court wherein the Eviction Petition No.Nil of 2025 has been kept pending without any action. Learned advocate for the respondent authorities is present. In view of no progress in the application/petitioner referred to herein above being processed, I direct the concerned authority to issue notice upon the present petitioner/plaintiff so that the progress of the proceeding of the consequent steps may be transparent to him. The concerned authority would adhere to the process of law and would dispose of the Eviction Petition No.Nil of 2025, which was submitted with the concerned authority on 10th October, 2025 within a reasonable period of time, preferably, as expeditiously as possible. 2 Since no affidavit-in-opposition has been called for, the allegations contained in the writ petition are deemed to have been no admitted by the respondents. With the aforesaid observations, WPA/104/2026 is disposed of, without any order as to costs. ( Tirthankar Ghosh, J. )